﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>White Peak Software Forums / Official Support Forums / SMTP Diagnostics Support  / Does download size matter? / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.4</generator><description>White Peak Software Forums</description><link>http://www.whitepeaksoftware.com/forums/</link><webMaster>info@whitepeaksoftware.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:25:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>RE: Does download size matter?</title><link>http://www.whitepeaksoftware.com/forums/Topic41-5-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]michel goujane (12/13/2006)[/b][hr]yes i think the download size matter[/quote]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Download size matters but in the case of SMTP Diagnostics the size increased by less than 1 MB.  Actually I think it was less than 500 KB when all was said and done.  The command line version of SMTP Diagnostics has been included in the download file for a long time now and I don't think anyone even noticed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-KIRBY</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:21:37 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Kirby Turner</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Does download size matter?</title><link>http://www.whitepeaksoftware.com/forums/Topic41-5-1.aspx</link><description>yes i think the download size matter</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:00:02 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>michel goujane</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Does download size matter?</title><link>http://www.whitepeaksoftware.com/forums/Topic41-5-1.aspx</link><description>[quote][b]Kirby Turner (10/4/2005)[/b][hr]I don't know the actual number yet but I would image the download file would increase by less than 1 MB.[/quote]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMO, users not will complain about a size increase of less than 1 MB. </description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:59:18 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Frank Smith</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Does download size matter?</title><link>http://www.whitepeaksoftware.com/forums/Topic41-5-1.aspx</link><description>I don't know the actual number yet but I would image the download file would increase by less than 1 MB.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on feedback received so far (including email feedback), I'm going to follow Frank's suggestion to do what is easiest.  The command line feature will be implemented in a separate executable.  And to avoid potential problems, no runtime libraries will be used.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks to everyone who sent feeback!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-KIRBY</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:42:13 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Kirby Turner</dc:creator></item><item><title>RE: Does download size matter?</title><link>http://www.whitepeaksoftware.com/forums/Topic41-5-1.aspx</link><description>How much larger will be the download be?  If the increase size is relatively small I would say do what is easiest for you.</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:22:21 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Frank Smith</dc:creator></item><item><title>Does download size matter?</title><link>http://www.whitepeaksoftware.com/forums/Topic41-5-1.aspx</link><description>I want to add a command line option to SMTP Diagnostics.  Having a duel mode application, one executable for both the GUI and console, is doable but has certain limitations and problems.  Therefore, it looks like I need to create two separate executables.  [Note: Sun does this with Java (java.exe and javaw.exe) and Microsoft has cscript.exe and wscript.exe.]&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With two executables the size of the download will grow, so I'm thinking about using a runtime package that contains the common code.  Unfortunately this means I have to use the VCL runtime packages as well.  This will reduce the size of the download but it increases the number of files installed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In your opinion, does size matter or would you rather have a self-contained executable?  In other words, do you prefer a smaller download or fewer files?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;-KIRBY</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 08:42:37 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Kirby Turner</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>